Note that some links will break as pages are moved, websites are abandoned, etc.
If this happens, please try searching for the page in the Wayback Machine at www.archive.org.
Charles, Prince of Wales, has been unusually public in expressing his views. He told a conference at St James's Palace "I was accused once of being the enemy of the Enlightenment" "I felt proud of that." That's a remarkable point of view for someone who, if he succeeds, will become the patron of that product of the age of enlightenment, the Royal Society...In July 2013, the Minister of Health, Jeremy Hunt, visited the prince at Clarence House. The visit was reported to be to persuade the minister to defend homeopathy, though it was more likely to have been to press the case to confer a government stamp of approval on herbalists and traditional Chinese Medicine practitioners by giving them statutory regulation. This is a matter that was recently raised again in parliament by Charles' greatest ally, David Tredinnick MP (Con, Bosworth) who got into trouble for charging astrology software to expenses. We shall never know what pressure was applied. A ruling of the Information Commissioner judged, reasonably enough, that there was public interest in knowing what influences were being brought to bear on public policy. But the Attorney General overruled the judgement on the grounds that "Disclosure of the correspondence could damage The Prince of Wales' ability to perform his duties when he becomes King." That, of course, is exactly what we are worried about. The attorney general, while trying to justify the secrecy of Charles' letters, said "It is a matter of the highest importance within our constitutional framework that the Monarch is a politically neutral figure". Questions about health policy are undoubtedly political, and the highly partisan interventions of the prince in the political process make his behaviour unconstitutional. They endanger the monarchy itself." Professor David Colquhoun, DC Science (30th July 2013)